People Get Ready ~ Jeff Beck with Rod Stewart

People Get Ready

Song by Jeff Beck, Rod Stewart

jeff-beck-rod-stewart

(Chorus)
People get ready
There’s a train a-coming
You don’t need no baggage
You just get on board
All you need is faith
To hear the diesels humming
Don’t need no ticket
You just thank the Lord

(Verse 1)
People get ready
For the train to Jordan
Picking up passengers
From coast to coast
Faith is the key
Open the doors and board them
There’s room for all
Among the loved the most

(Verse 2)
There ain’t no room
For the hopeless sinner
Who would hurt all mankind
Justs to save his own
Have pity on those
Whose chances are thinner
Cause there’s no hiding place
From the Kingdom’s Throne

(Chorus)
So people get ready
For the train a-comin’
You don’t need no baggage
You just get on board
All you need is faith
To hear the diesels humming
Don’t need no ticket
You just thank, you just thank the Lord

Yeah
Oh
Yeah
Oh
I’m getting…

Why Steve Jobs Didn’t Let His Kids Use iPads

Source: http://nextshark.com/why-steve-jobs-didnt-let-his-kids-use-ipads-and-why-you-shouldnt-either/
If you fall within the Gen-Y era like us, chances are you’ve given a bunch of thought as to how you would raise your own children in this day and age (assuming you don’t have children already). Especially with technology, so much has changed since our childhoods in the 90s. Here’s one question: Would you introduce the technological wonder/heroin that is the iPod and iPad to your kids?

Steve Jobs wouldn’t, and for good reason too.

Steve-Jobs-and-family

In a Sunday article, New York Times reporter Nick Bilton said he once assumingly asked Jobs, “So your kids must love the iPad?”

Jobs responded: “They haven’t used it. We limit how much technology our kids use at home.” Especially in Silicon Valley, there is actually a trend of tech execs and engineers who shield their kids from technology. They even send their kids to non-tech schools like the Waldorf School in Los Altos, where computers aren’t found anywhere because they only focus on hands-on learning.

There is a quote that was highlighted in The Times by Chris Anderson, CEO of 3D Robotics and a father of five. He explains what drives those who work in tech to keep it from their kids.

“My kids accuse me and my wife of being fascists and overly concerned about tech, and they say that none of their friends have the same rules… That’s because we have seen the dangers of technology firsthand. I’ve seen it in myself, I don’t want to see that happen to my kids.”

If our current addictions to our iPhones and other tech is any indication, we may be setting up our children for incomplete, handicapped lives devoid of imagination, creativity and wonder when we hook them onto technology at an early age. We were the last generation to play outside precisely because we didn’t have smartphones and laptops. We learned from movement, hands-on interaction, and we absorbed information through books and socialization with other humans as opposed to a Google search.

Learning in different ways has helped us become more well-rounded individuals — so, should we be more worried that we are robbing our children of the ability to Snapchat and play “Candy Crush” all day if we don’t hand them a smartphone, or should we more worried that we would be robbing them of a healthier, less dependent development if we do hand them a smartphone? I think Steve Jobs had it right in regard to his kids.

So the next time you think about how you will raise your kids, you may want to (highly) consider not giving them whatever fancy tech we’ll have while they are growing up. Play outside with them and surround them with nature; they might hate you, but they will absolutely thank you for it later, because I’m willing to bet that’s exactly how many of us feel about it now that we are older

Zero To One ~ Peter Thiel

“EVERY MOMENT IN BUSINESS HAPPENS ONLY ONCE”.

The next Bill Gates will not build an operating system. The next Larry Page or Sergey Brin won’t make a search engine. And the next Mark Zuckerberg won’t create a social network.  If you are copying these guys, you aren’t learning from them.  It’s easier to copy a model than to make something new:  doing what we already know how to do takes the world from 1 to n, adding more of something familiar.

But every time we create something new, we go from 0 to 1. The act of creation is singular, as is the moment of creation, and the result is something fresh and strange.

Zero to One is about how to build companies that create new things. It draws on everything Peter Thiel has learned directly as a co-founder of PayPal and Palantir and then an investor in hundreds of startups, including Facebook and SpaceX.  The single most powerful pattern he has noticed is that successful people find value in unexpected places, and they do this by thinking about business from first principles instead of formulas.

Ask not, what would Mark do?  Ask: WHAT VALUABLE COMPANY IS NOBODY BUILDING? “– “Thiel starts from the bold premise that we live in an age of technological stagnation, even if we’re too distracted by our new mobile devices to notice.

Progress has stalled in every industry except computers, and globalization is hardly the revolution people think it is.  It’s true that the world can get marginally richer by building new copies of old inventions, making horizontal progress from “1 to n.”  But true innovators have nothing to copy.

The most valuable companies of the future will make vertical progress from “0 to 1,” creating entirely new industries and products that have never existed before.

Zero to One is about how to build these companies. Tomorrow’s champions will not win by competing ruthlessly in today’s marketplace.  They will escape competition altogether, because their businesses will be unique. In today’s post-internet bubble world, conventional wisdom dictates that all the good ideas are taken, and the economy becomes a tournament in which everyone competes to reach the top.

Zero to One shows how to quit the zero-sum tournament by finding an untapped market, creating a new product, and quickly scaling up a monopoly business that captures lasting value. Planning an escape from competition is essential for every business and every individual, not just for technology startups.  The greatest secret of the modern era is that there are still unique frontiers to explore and new problems to solve.


Seven Questions Every Startup Business Must Answer

Since 2012, many companies in the “CleanTech Industry” have crashed; gone out of business or filed for bankruptcy because they neglected one or more of the following seven questions:

  1. The Engineering Question

Can you create breakthrough technology instead of incremental improvements?

A great company should have proprietary technology an order of magnitude better than its nearest substitute.  Companies must strive for 10x better because merely incremental improvements often end up meaning no improvement at all for the consumer.  Only when your product / service is 10x better can you offer the customer transparent  superiority.

2.  The Timing Question (chapter 2)

Is now the right time to start your particular business?

Entering a slow-moving market can be a good strategy, but only if you have a definite and realistic plan to take it over.

3. The Monopoly Question (chapter 3)

Are you starting with a big share of a small market?

Exaggerating your business’s own uniqueness is an easy way to botch the monopoly question.  You can’t dominate a submarket if it’s fictional, and huge markets are highly competitive, not highly attainable.

4. The People Question (chapter 9 and 10)

Do you have the right team?

Never invest in a tech CEO that wears a suit.  The best sales is hidden.  There’s nothing wrong with a CEO who can sell, but if he actually looks like a salesman, he probably bad at sales and worse at tech.

5. The Distribution Question (chapter 11)

Do you have a way to not just create but deliver your product?

The world is not a laboratory: selling and delivering a product / service is at least as important as the product / service itself.  Technical challenges can be overcome successfully, but its the other obstacles that can not be overcome.

6. The Durability Question (chapter 6)

Will your market position be defensible 10 and 20 years into the future?

Every entrepreneur should plan to be the last mover in her particular market.  That starts with asking yourself: what will the world look like 10 and 20 years from now, and how will my business fit in?

7. The Secret Question (chapter 8)

Have you identified a unique opportunity that others don’t see?

Great companies have secrets: specific reasons for success that other people don’t see.


“Zero to One shows how to pursue them using the most important, most difficult, and most underrated skill in every job or industry: thinking for yourself”– Peter Thiel


Conclusion: Stagnation or Singularity?

If even the most farsighted founders cannot plan beyond the next 20 and 30 years, is there anything to say about the very distant future?  We don’t know anything specific, but we can make out the broad contours.  Philosopher Nick Bostrom describes four possible patterns for the future of humanity.

The ancients saw all of history as a never-ending alternation between prosperity and ruin.  Only recently have people dared to hope that we might permanently escape misfortune, and it’s still possible to wonder whether the stability we take for granted will last.

recurrent-collapse

However, we usually suppress out doubts.  Conventional wisdom seems to assume instead that the whole world will converge toward a plateau of development similar to the life of the richest countries today.  In this scenario, the future will look a lot like the present.

plateau

Given the interconnected geography of the contemporary world and the unprecedented destructive power of modern weaponry, it’s hard not to ask whether a large-scale social disaster could be contained were it to occur.  This what fuels our fears of the third possible scenario: a collapse so devastating that we won’t survive it.

Extinction

The last of the four possibilities is the hardest one to imagine: accelerating takeoff toward a much better future.  The end result of such a breakthrough could take a number of forms, but any one of them would be so different from the present as to defy description.

takeoff

Which of the four will it be?

Recurrent collapse seems unlikely: the knowledge underlying civilization is so widespread today that complete annihilation would be more probable than a long period of darkness followed by recovery.  However, in case of extinction, there is no human future of any kind to consider.

If we define the future as a time that looks different from the present, then most people aren’t expecting any future at all; instead, they expect coming decades to bring more globalization, convergence, and sameness.  In this scenario, poorer countries will catch up to richer countries, and the world as a whole will reach an economic plateau.  But even if a truly globalized plateau were possible, could it last?  In the best case, economic competition would be more intense than ever before for every single person and firm on the planet.

However, when you add competition to consume scarce resources, it’s hard to see how a global plateau could last indefinitely.  Without new techology to relieve competitive pressures, stagnation is likely to erupt into conflict.  In case of conflict on a global scale, stagnation collapses into extinction.

That leaves the fourth scenario, in which we create new technology to make a much better future.  The most dramatic version of this outcome is called the Singularity, an attempt to name the imagined result of new technologies so powerful as to transcend the current limits of our understanding.  Ray Kurzweil, the best-known Singularitarian, starts from Moore’s law and traces exponential growth trends in dozens of fields, confidently projecting a future of superhuman artificial intelligence.  According to Kurzweil, “the Singularity is near,” it’s inevitable, and all we have to do is prepare ourselves to accept it.

But no matter how many trends can be traced, the future won’t happen on its own.  What the Singularity would look like matters less than the stark choice we face today between the two most likely scenarios: nothing or something.  It’s up to us.  We cannot take for granted that the future will be better, and that means we need to work to create it today.

Whether we achieve the Singularity on a cosmic scale is perhaps less important than whether we seize the unique opportunities we have to do new things in our own working lives.  Everything important to us — the universe, the planet, the country, our company, your life, and this very moment — is singular.

Our task today is to find singular ways to create the new things that will make the future not just different, but better — to go from 0 to 1.  The essential first step is to think for yourself.  Only by seeing our world anew, as fresh and strange as it was to the ancients who saw it first, can we both re-create it and preserve it for the future.

I assumed you stole the car !

The light turned yellow at the intersection just in front of him.

He did the right thing and stopped at the crosswalk, even though he could have beaten the red light by accelerating through the intersection.

The tailgating woman behind him was furious and honked her horn, screaming in frustration, as she missed her chance to get through the intersection.

assumed-stolen-carAs she was still in mid-rant, she heard a tap on her window and looked up into the face of a very serious police officer.

The officer ordered her to exit her car with her hands up.

He took her to the police station where she was searched, fingerprinted, photographed and placed in a holding cell.

After a couple of hours, a policeman approached the cell and opened the door.

She was escorted back to the booking desk where the arresting officer was waiting with her personal effects.

He said, ”I’m very sorry for this mistake. You see, I pulled up behind your car while you were blowing your horn, giving the guy in front of you the finger and cursing at him.

I noticed the ‘What Would Jesus Do’ bumper sticker, the ‘Choose Life’ license plate holder, the ‘Follow Me to Sunday-School’ bumper sticker, and the chrome-plated Christian fish emblem on the trunk,

so naturally ……

I assumed you had stolen the car.”

Run to the Battle: Maverick Theme Song (by Steve Camp)

MAVERICK:  a person who refuses to follow the customs or rules of a group without breaking the Law (or disobedience to God’s calling); in the world but not of the world; not part of the herd; Unbranded (no-denomination), free roaming (itinerant evangelist); while listening with discernment.. managed and directed by no one, but God.

1 Chronicles 4:9-10

New King James Version (NKJV)

Now Jabez was more honorable than his brothers, and his mother called his name Jabez,[a]saying, “Because I bore him in pain.” 10 And Jabez called on the God of Israel saying,

Oh, that You would bless me indeed, and enlarge my territory, that Your hand would be with me, and that You would keep me from evil, that I may not cause pain!”

So God granted him what Jabez requested.

Lord, this too is my prayer… show Your favor and financial blessing so I too may extend a hand of favor to those in my circle of influence.

In JESUS name, I pray.

Andrew Carnegie’s Weird “Wealth Machine” to Help Secure Their Retirements

Andrew-CarnegieDuring his lifetime, Andrew Carnegie became one of the wealthiest men on the planet. Before he began giving away his wealth, his net worth was valued at $475 million — the equivalent of about $75 billion in today’s dollars.

It’s been almost 100 years since Carnegie died. Today, he is remembered most for building Carnegie Hall in New York City and establishing the modern U.S. library system. Both are still in existence today, a remarkable testament to Carnegie’s legacy.

But did you know Carnegie created something else before he died that’s helped tens of thousands of people to secure their retirements?

Carnegie had a soft spot for American educators. He wanted to help provide professors at schools like Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, and Columbia with financial security in their old age. So in 1905, he gave $10 million to set up America’s very first variable annuity.

From $10 Million to $279 Billion…

Carnegie’s fledgling variable annuity started with $10 million. Today it is worth an astounding $279 billion. It is now called the Teacher’s Insurance and Annuity Association – College Retirement Equities Fund, or TIAA-CREF for short.

Think about that. The TIAA-CREF was started in the year 1905 and it still exists today.

That means it survived the stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression that followed. It survived Black Monday in 1987. And it survived the more recent financial meltdown of 2008 and 2009.

In fact, it has survived all the booms and busts of the last 110 years! That’s an amazing track record.

The only reason Carnegie’s annuity has survived so long is because annuities make conservative investments in order to fulfill promises to its investors. Therefore, annuities don’t gamble or make risky investments. They play it safe so they can continue paying out guaranteed payments every single year.

Ben Bernanke’s Shocking Retirement Secret

Before Ben Bernanke became the chairman of the Federal Reserve, he taught economics at Princeton University. While there, he set up two annuities through the annuity company Carnegie founded.

Apparently, Bernanke’s retirement strategy didn’t change a bit when he took over at the Fed because his two largest assets are still the annuities he set up while working at Princeton. Each of these annuities are currently valued between $500,001 and $1 million.

While other experts have criticized Bernanke’s conservative approach to retirement investing, maybe the better approach is to ask a question: Why would the man who was head of the most powerful financial institution in the world choose to invest in annuities?

The answer to this question will become clear when you compare average retirement savings to one particular group of people.

The Surprising Reason Why College Professors Have More Saved for Retirement than You

Ben Bernanke isn’t the only one who is benefiting from annuity investments. Many college professors and other higher education professionals have invested in the same annuity fund originally set up by Andrew Carnegie.

And the proof is in the pudding.

In a recent study conducted by TIAA-CREF, they discovered that “83 percent of tenured and tenure-track faculty felt very or somewhat confident they will have enough money to live comfortably throughout their retirement years, compared to 55 percent of workers overall.”

And there’s a good reason for their confidence. According to surveys, higher education employees who participate in retirement plans have average account balances that are 43% to 46% higher than average Americans.

The 8th Wonder of the World

Famous academic Albert Einstein once said, “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it… he who doesn’t… pays it.”

Einstein put his money where his mouth was by investing in annuities way back in 1933 when they were still a relatively new investment vehicle.

Annuities exist to provide people with safe and predictable investment returns every single year during retirement. Many of them come with guaranteed rates of return.

Just one year bad year in the stock market can take years to recover from. But safe and predictable compound growth — like that provided by annuity funds — can provide investors with a stable retirement and peace of mind.

That’s why Einstein invested in annuities. It’s why Ben Bernanke is invested in annuities. And it’s why thousands of higher education professionals invest in annuities every year. Maybe annuities are worth a closer look after all.